At the heart of it is dissatisfaction with the protection offered consumers by the National Home Builders Registration Council (NHBRC) against fly-by-night builders and shoddy workmanship.
Unsatisfactory performance
In the preamble to the bill, one of the objectives was to clarify the scope and application of the proposed act and to clearly identify those to whom it applied. Persons who renovated or built their own homes for their own use have long considered themselves outside of the act of ’98.
Most importantly, they have happily considered themselves outside the jurisdiction of the NHBRC — which does not have the best of reputations. Many home builders object to having to become members and pay membership fees to a body that they consider does not give value for money or even perform a satisfactory job.
However, the bill’s new section 1a defines the scope of the act to apply to:
In the act, the business of home building is defined as follows:
The Amendment Bill extends the ranks of business home builders to include persons who construct homes not only for the purpose of selling it, but also to lease or rent it.
Power to the council
The bill also gives more powers to the council. In the act, the authority to grant exemptions lies with the minister; under the Amendment Bill these powers are handed to the council.
The council’s watchdog role is also widened. Under the act, the council must pay out funds in situations where, among others, major structural defects have manifested and have been notified to the builder within five years of the date of occupation. The council is only liable where the defects result from non-compliance with NHBRC technical requirements.
Failure to pay
The builder must be notified of these defects within this time period.
A common complaint alleged against the NHBRC is failure to pay claims — usually explained by the council as "lack of funds". Under the act, the council may reduce any amount of damages it is liable for, or refuse claims, or make a once-off settlement if money is not available, or is expected not to be available for that purpose due to future demands on its funds. The Amendment Bill further empowers the council, when it has insufficient funds to meet demands, to increase builders’ enrollment fees.
In terms of section 14 of the act, no home builder shall commence construction of a home without having submitted the required documents and paying the prescribed enrolment fee.
Does the bill help?
In the Amendment Bill, a new section 14a is included which provides for late enrolment and non-declared non-enrolment. However, once again the council is empowered to take "disciplinary measures" for late enrolment and non-declared non-enrolment as it deems fit.
The Amendment Bill does provide further statutory regulation of the home building industry. But whether it provides more adequate protection to consumers is arguable.